what about remembering and forgetting

In a minimum of one-page (double spaced, 12pt font), reflect on the following:

Go to http://www.exploratorium.edu/memory/dont_forget/index.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Play the memory solitaire game. Then play game #2: Tell Yourself a Story.

  1. Did your memory improve the second time? Why or why not?
  2. What do you learn about your own memory from these games?

Format your reflection in APA format if you choose to write it. The one page limit is for the body of the paper, and does not include the reference or title page. No abstract is required. Try to support your statements with references to the readings or to other academic references.

You may turn in a file attachment, an online document via URL, or you may create a video reflection (to create an submit a video reflection, see this document: https://community.canvaslms.com/docs/DOC-10668-421254356) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Rubric

Reflection Rubric

Reflection Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDepth of Reflection

5.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Demonstrate a conscious and thorough understanding of the writing prompt and the subject matter. This reflection can be used as an example for other students.

4.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Demonstrate a thoughtful understanding of the writing prompt and the subject matter.

3.0 pts

Approaches Expectations

Demonstrate a basic understanding of the writing prompt and the subject matter.

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Demonstrate a limited understanding of the writing prompt and subject matter. This reflection needs revision.

0.0 pts

Does not meet expectations

Demonstrate little or no understanding of the writing prompt and subject matter. This reflection needs revision.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of support from research sources

5.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Use specific and convincing examples from the texts studied to support claims in your own writing, making insightful and applicable connections between texts.

4.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Use relevant examples from the texts studied to support claims in your own writing, making applicable connections between texts.

3.0 pts

Approaches Expectations

Use examples from the text to support most claims in your writing with some connections made between texts.

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Use incomplete or vaguely developed examples to only partially support claims with no connections made between texts.

0.0 pts

Does not meet expectations

No examples from the text are used and claims made in your own writing are unsupported and irrelevant to the topic at hand.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage Use

5.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Use stylistically sophisticated language that is precise and engaging, with notable sense of voice, awareness of audience and purpose, and varied sentence structure.

4.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Use language that is fluent and original, with evident a sense of voice, awareness of audience and purpose, and the ability to vary sentence structure.

3.0 pts

Approaches Expectations

Use basic but appropriate language, with a basic sense of voice, some awareness of audience and purpose and some attempt to vary sentence structure.

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Use language that is vague or imprecise for the audience or purpose, with little sense of voice, and a limited awareness of how to vary sentence structure.

0.0 pts

Does not meet expectations

Use language that is unsuitable for the audience and purpose, with little or no awareness of sentence structure.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and mechanics

5.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Demonstrate control of the conventions with essentially no errors, even with sophisticated language.

4.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Demonstrate control of the conventions, exhibiting occasional errors only when using sophisticated language.

3.0 pts

Approaches Expectations

Demonstrate partial control of the conventions, exhibiting occasional errors that do not hinder comprehension.

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Demonstrate limited control of the conventions, exhibiting frequent errors that make comprehension difficult.

0.0 pts

Does not meet expectations

Demonstrate little or no control of the conventions, making comprehension almost impossible.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting

5.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Demonstrate control of APA formatting throughout the paper with essentially no errors.

4.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Demonstrate control of APA formatting, exhibiting occasional errors only when using complicated or unique citations or other elements.

3.0 pts

Approaches Expectations

Demonstrate partial control of APA formatting, exhibiting occasional errors that do not violate intellectual property guidelines or that would indicate plagiarism.

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Demonstrate limited control of APA formatting, exhibiting frequent errors that make an assertion of plagiarism possible or that interfere with the visual presentation of the paper.

0.0 pts

Does not meet expectations

Demonstrate little or no control of APA formatting or uses an alternate style such as MLA.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 25.0

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.