critical analysis on hills like white elephants

Ernest Hemingway’s short story “Hills Like White Elephants” is a story about a conversation between two people. Yes, that’s it. Two people talking. I am not fooling you here; there is no trick or hidden meaning. We have two people, sitting at a train station, looking at things and trying new drinks, because that’s all they do.

Before you begin reading and analyzing this story, I would make one request of you: do not look for any information online. No Wikipedia, no SparkNotes, no Cliff Notes. I know that sometimes it can be easier or more helpful to do a bit of research to help you discern more from the literature, but this is a piece that I really, really want to know your individual thoughts on. The reason I say this is that learning the “critical consensus” of this story usually alters people’s understanding in a way that combines a great many cognitive biases (Framing Effect, Expectation Bias, Observer-Expectancy Effect, just to name a few).

With that in mind, please just read the story and let me know what you think. As you’re reading, consider the following:

  • What is the relationship between these two characters?
  • What the actual heck are they even talking about?
  • What does this conversation actually accomplish, if anything?

This is a relatively longer piece, and I should think it will spawn many errant and perhaps nonsensical ideas, so you should have no problem reaching the default minimum word count of 300 words for this assignment.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.